PDA

View Full Version : QUESTION!!!!


fuzzyroo
April 15th, 2006, 03:30 PM
i've got a BIG question! WHY WAS I NOT NOTIFIED of my gallery deletion, 13000 page views, GONE just poof no explination! now most of those pics are lost for ever, just gone! *pop* dissapere! i dont understand! it was bring people to the forum.

wait, let me guess, some one complained...one emo retard ruines me ONCE again, what the fuck people! seriously!

TheColdOne
April 15th, 2006, 03:57 PM
what the hell are you talking about?

Tygar
April 15th, 2006, 04:10 PM
It was mostly likely counted as human pornography, that is why I think.

Azenis
April 15th, 2006, 04:28 PM
I didn't do it, but I think Tygar hit the nail on the head. Not a statistical-data gathering question, though; moving this to BBS Help.

Tygar
April 17th, 2006, 08:15 AM
My more-indepth explination;

Rule Number 10:
10. No human porn pictures, period.

--It breaks one of the forum rules.

--Just putting on a pair of paws, a tail and some ears just doesn't stop it from being counted as human porn.

--Making an account just to post yourself naked in a half suit in the gallery probally doesn't help that much either.

--It might have been cute to most people, but it nonetheless broke one of the more stictly enforced rules of the forums.

Morgan
April 17th, 2006, 09:41 AM
I deleted it, had picture of humans in it.

Dont need a warning, it's a serious rule, just as serious as underagers.

As Tygar points out, no human porn, Period.

honestly, you can be banned forever for that.


I'm sorry you relied on our gallerie to store your data, but again that's not what it's meant for.

fuzzyroo
April 17th, 2006, 11:50 PM
you know, a simple "hey" would have been nice.


but still i didn't make the rulse, i'm not going to question, i'm just going to move somewhere else, where self expresion can be appreciated, and not dictated by Nazis... you know, the "non" sexy kind!

Velina
April 18th, 2006, 12:07 AM
you know, a simple "hey" would have been nice.


but still i didn't make the rulse, i'm not going to question, i'm just going to move somewhere else, where self expresion can be appreciated, and not dictated by Nazis... you know, the "non" sexy kind!

You lost your argument the minute you brought out the N word. Just because there are rules doesn't mean we're Nazis.

Poop Dick
April 18th, 2006, 12:41 AM
you know, a simple "hey" would have been nice.


but still i didn't make the rulse, i'm not going to question, i'm just going to move somewhere else, where self expresion can be appreciated, and not dictated by Nazis... you know, the "non" sexy kind!

You lost your argument the minute you brought out the N word. Just because there are rules doesn't mean we're Nazis.

Wrong Velina. YOU'RE STILL A NAZI *WHINE!*

http://fuzzyroo.livejournal.com/29382.html

Khaz
April 18th, 2006, 01:12 AM
but still i didn't make the rulse, i'm not going to question, i'm just going to move somewhere else, where self expresion can be appreciated, and not dictated by Nazis... you know, the "non" sexy kind!
You know, those rules aren't there just because some admins felt like it. There are REASONS behind them.

And Velina is right, calling the mods and admins "Nazis" completely takes away all respect (and pity!) anyone could have for you.

Morgan
April 18th, 2006, 05:46 AM
Roj, go chase your tail...


FuzzyRoo... What to do with you, maybe you cant read?

I'll tell you what, look up "Title 18" laws, and you'll see why.

We can alow you to post yourself nude if we have a copy of your orginal birth certificate, the one with the embossed seal, a state or other government issued picture ID, and your social security card. You will then need to fill out 6 release forms, and do a recorded statement on video saying you are 18 or older and will not hold the compnay responsible. After you go through voluntary STD tests, and out lawyers reveiw all this paper work, then, maybe if you're lucky, you can post nudes.

Trust me I know, Since I am Title 18ed.


Isnt it sad that you have 6 posts, most of which are bitching because I took off your illegal pictures?

This is why George W. Bush is president...

Khaz
April 18th, 2006, 12:49 PM
OH SNAP!

Poop Dick
April 18th, 2006, 02:37 PM
I would like to add this:

Roo, today is your birthday, no? So hear me out here, k?

You said you posted your pictures over 2 years ago, and I'll ASSUME that you just turned 20 today? Once again, another reason to delete the images, for that would be child porn no matter how old you are right now.

zealot_guy
July 12th, 2006, 11:20 PM
Child porn? What?

20-2=18...
so...wouldn't that make him 18 when the pics where posted?

All Title 18 and Rule 10 asside...
I'm confused...

Khaz
July 12th, 2006, 11:37 PM
20-2=18...
so...wouldn't that make him 18 when the pics where posted?
It doesn't matter if it's child porn or not here, but...

20 - >2 = <18.

Morgan
July 13th, 2006, 05:25 AM
okay, umm, again, title 18 isnt just about age....


It's the fact that we must have proof of your age, your real name, SS#, blah blah blah, it's a bunch of shit.


Simply put, no nude humans here ever what-so-ever.

Kupok
July 13th, 2006, 02:48 PM
I've read through this topic after catching a friend spazzing about it on livejournal.

Yes, Fuzzyroo Godwined (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_Law) right off. This is steriotypical furry behavior and should be VERY VERY avoided.

However, I do feel that before Fuzzyroo godwined the thread, Morgan Löwe demonstraited poor moderation. At the very least, I feel Morgan Löwe should have topic-locked after the post to prevent further posts on the subject.

At best through, An explaination of the United States law recently gone into effect would have made the reason and motivation for the rule clear. I've alwase hated teaches who gave rules without reason.

For clearification, Any webspace hosted on US soil (I.E. This one) that hosts pornographic images (Real People nude and naughtier) must have documentation showing that the target person is over 18, and WAS over 18 at the time of the picture, along with a premission document signed by the target. Any webspace in violation of this can have some seriosly heavy fines levied at best.

This is not a subject of "Ewww hyooomins"
This is a subject of avoiding the 4Chan Party Van (http://www.wikiworld.com/wiki/index.php/4chan#.26.2C_.3F.2C_.2A.2C_.23)

Azenis
July 13th, 2006, 07:57 PM
I think Morgan explained that when he said to research Title 18 laws, and then explained what he needed in order to host photos. But thanks for the clarification.

Morgan
July 14th, 2006, 05:56 AM
I left it open for debate.


Sometimes, the other members can explain it better than me, that's hy I;m admin, and try not to mod :o)

Thank you though, Kupok.